Internet Studies – Bibliography

Internet/Culture

• Dodge, M. and Kitchen, R. 2001. Mapping Cyberspace. New York and London: Routledge. Hakken, D. 1999. Cyborgs @ Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
• Jones, S. 1998. Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Levy, Piere. 1997. Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cybersapece. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
• Lunnefeld, (editor). 2000. The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on the New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT.
• Mitchell, W. J. 2000. E-topia. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT.
• Slavin, James. 2000. The Internet and Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Stefik, M. 1999. The Internet Edge: Social, Technical and Legal Challenges for a Networked World. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT.
• Stefik, M. 1997. Internet Dreams: Archetypes, Myths, and Metaphors. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT.

 Resources

• http://www.ciolek.com/WWWVLPages/QltyPages/NetStudies.html
• http://internethistory.ucla.edu/
• http://mfx.dasburo.com/old-home/reviews/internet_book_list.html
• http://mediaresearchhub.ssrc.org/
• http://mediaresearchhub.ssrc.org/resource-database
• Computer-Mediated Communication Studies Center (www.december.com, USA)
• http://libguides.library.curtin.edu.au/internet-studies
• http://www.akamai.com/stateoftheinternet/
• google.com/publicdata
• http://www.aau.org/?q=datad
• http://www.oafrica.com/data
• http://afrographique.tumblr.com/

Theoretical/Experimental

• New Media, Old Media: A History and Theory Reader (Routledge, 2005)
• • Chun, Wendy. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics.
• Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2006.
• • Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
• • Kittler, Friedrich. There is No Software.
• • Manovitch, Lev. The Language of New Media.
• • Gitelman, Lisa. Always Already New.
• • Nakamura, Lisa. Race and the Visual Culture of the Internet
• • Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture
• • Lanier, Jaron. You Are Not a Gadget.
• • Schmitz, J. & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail:
• A test of the social influence model. Communication Research, 18, pp. 487-523.
• • Fulk, J. (1993). “Social construction of communication technology.” Academy of Management
• Journal 36: 921-950.
• • Sitkin, S., K. Sutcliffe, et al. (1992). “A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in
• organizations.” Human Communication Research 18(4): 563-598.
• • Carlson, J. and R. Zmud (1999). “Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of
• media richness perceptions.” Academy of Management Journal 42(2): 153-170.
• • Walther, J. (1996). “Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and
• hyperpersonal interaction.” Communication Research 23: 3-43.
• • Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-
• mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
• • Orlikowski, W. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying
• technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404-428.
• •
• Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B. Studying online social networks. Journal of
• Computer Mediated Communication 3(1), jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/garton.html

Et Cetera